General
SARRAZIN v. AUGUSTUS CRAFT CO., Limited
93 F. 989·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1899
Before PARDEE, Mc-CORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SARRAZIN v. AUGUSTUS CRAFT CO., Limited.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
April 11, 1899.)
No. 789.
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana.
W. R. Stringfellow and T. M. Gill, for plaintiff in error.
E. H. Farrar, E. B. Kruttschnitt, B. F. Jonas, and Hewes T. Gurley, for defendant in error.
Before PARDEE, Mc-CORMICK, and SHELBY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PARDEE, Circuit Judge.]
PARDEE, Circuit Judge.
The pleadings, rulings, hills of exception, assignments of error, and the questions involved in this case are precisely the same as in Sarrazin v. Tobacco Co. (just decided) 93 Fed. 624, and, for the reasons given in the opinion in that case, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.