Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In the Matter of the Arbitration of Michael Bennett, Respondent with the Union Elevated Railroad Company, of Brooklyn, Appellant
121 N.Y. 718·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
All concur.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Arbitration of Michael Bennett, Respondent with the Union Elevated Railroad Company, of Brooklyn, Appellant.
(Argued June 18, 1890;
decided June 24, 1890.)
Appeal from judgment of tne General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December 10, 1889, which affirmed a judgment in favor of the respondent entered upon an order of Special Term confirming the award of certain arbitrators and affirmed an order of Special Term; also appeal from so much of said order as affirmed an order denying a motion to vacate said award.
George W. Wingate for appellant.
John Leary for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment and order affirmed.