Contracts · MBE-tested
HANSON et al. v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY
384 U.S. 211·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HANSON et al. v. CHESAPEAKE & OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY.
No. 1170.
Decided May 16, 1966.
Robert O. Ellis, Jr., for petitioners.
William, C. Beatty and Amos A. Bolen for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit is vacated and the case is remanded to that court for further consideration in light of Gunther v. San Diego & A. E. R. Co., 382 U. S. 257.