Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
SPERONI v. UNITED STATES of America
67 F.2d 1011·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SPERONI v. UNITED STATES of America.
No. 5021.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Oct. 6, 1933.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Now this day come the parties by their counsel, and this cause now comes on to be heard on the printed reeord and briefs of counsel and on oral arguments by Gerald T. Wiley, of Chicago, Ill., counsel for appellant, and by Daniel Anderson, of Chicago, Ill., counsel for appellee. On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of Illinois, Western Division, in this cause, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed.