General
(A) In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Bella Ditchick, Deceased. Ceille D. Ornstein, Appellant; Estelle Boyarsky, Respondent; (B) In the Matter of Philip Cataldo, et al., Respondents, v. Town of Hempstead, Appellant; (C) Elizabeth Kamen, Respondent, v. Samuel E. Kamen, Defendant, and Robert R. Kaufman, Appellant; (D) Stanley Schwarzbart et al., Respondents, v. Henley Development Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendant; (E) Sophie Ulman et al., Appellants, v. Burton Duke, Respondent
11 A.D.2d 1058·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1960·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(A) In the Matter of the Probate of the Will of Bella Ditchick, Deceased. Ceille D. Ornstein, Appellant; Estelle Boyarsky, Respondent. (B) In the Matter of Philip Cataldo, et al., Respondents, v. Town of Hempstead, Appellant. (C) Elizabeth Kamen, Respondent, v. Samuel E. Kamen, Defendant, and Robert R. Kaufman, Appellant. (D) Stanley Schwarzbart et al., Respondents, v. Henley Development Corp., Appellant, et al., Defendant. (E) Sophie Ulman et al., Appellants, v. Burton Duke, Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
[In each appeal] Motion by respondent [s] to dismiss appeal denied, on condition that appellant [s] argue or submit the appeal at the December Term, beginning November 28, 1960. The appeal is ordered on the calendar for said term. The record and appellants’] brief must be served and filed on or before November 14, 1960. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.