Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Ohio v. Kentucky
384 U.S. 982·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
June 13, 1966.
No. 27,
Original.
Ohio v. Kentucky.
William B. Saxbe, Attorney General of Ohio, and Robert M. Duncan for plaintiff on the motion. Robert Matthews, Attorney General of Kentucky, and John B. Browning, Assistant Attorney General, for defendant in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
The motion for leave to file bill of complaint granted and the Commonwealth of Kentucky is allowed sixty days to answer.