Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Clark, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, v. Manufacturers Trust Co.; and Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Clark, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian
335 U.S. 910·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 386.
No. 443.
Clark, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, v. Manufacturers Trust Co.; and Manufacturers Trust Co. v. Clark, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian.
Solicitor General Perlman for petitioner in No. 386.
Leonard G. Bisco for the Manufacturers Trust Co., petitioner in No. 443 and respondent in No. 386. Solicitor General Perl-man, Assistant Attorney General Bazelon, James L. Mor-risson, Joseph W. Bishop, Jr. and Philip Elman for respondent in No. 443.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Reported below: 169 F. 2d 932.