General
Mitsui & Co., Ltd. v. United States, protest 62/18763 (Portland, Oreg.); Victor B. Handal & Bro., Inc. v. United States, protests 63/8203, 63/23052, and 63/23053 (Los Angeles); International Expediters, Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 65/4696-14496, etc. (Chicago); Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United States, protest 65/8687-14911 (Chicago)
57 Cust. Ct. 784·United States Customs Court·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the SecoNd DrvisiON,
JuNE 15, 1966
No. P66/99. —
No. P66/100. —
No. P66/101. —
No. P66/102. —
Mitsui & Co., Ltd. v. United States, protest 62/18763 (Portland, Oreg.). Victor B. Handal & Bro., Inc. v. United States, protests 63/8203, 63/23052, and 63/23053 (Los Angeles). International Expediters, Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 65/4696-14496, etc. (Chicago). Karl Schroff & Associates, Inc. v. United States, protest 65/8687-14911 (Chicago) .
[MAJORITY — Ford, J.]
Ford, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of earphones similar in all material respects to those the subject of Motorola, Inc., and International Expediters, Inc. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 303, Abstract 69019), the claim of the plaintiffs -was sustained.