Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
SIMS MOTOR TRANSPORT LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES et al.
362 U.S. 637·Supreme Court of the United States·1960
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
SIMS MOTOR TRANSPORT LINES, INC., v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 823.
Decided May 23, 1960.
Harold T. Halfpenny and Mary Shaw for appellant.
Solicitor General Rankin, Acting Assistant Attorney General Bicks, Richard A. Solomon, Henry Geller and Robert W. Ginnane for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission.
Roland Rice and Franklin R. Overmyer for Holland Motor Express, Inc., et al.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motions of Holland Motor Express, Inc., et al., for leave to be named parties appellee and for leave to file a motion to affirm are granted. The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.