General
George E. Gee, Plaintiff in Error, v. Henry D. Gee
190 U.S. 557·Supreme Court of the United States·1903
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 285.
George E. Gee, Plaintiff in Error, v. Henry D. Gee.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota.
Submitted May 1, 1903.
Decided May 4, 1903.
Mr. Thomas G. Frost for plaintiff in error.
Mr. Leon E. Lum and Mr. J. L. Washburn for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Writ of error dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, on the authority of Beaupré v. Noyes, 138 U. S. 402; Haseltine v. Central Bank of Springfield, 183 U. S. 130. See 84 Minnesota, 384.