Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
The Jennie Clarkson Home for Children, Respondent, v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al., Appellants
182 N.Y. 508·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Jennie Clarkson Home for Children, Respondent, v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al., Appellants.
(Argued May 3, 1905;
decided May 30, 1905.)
Jennie Clarkson Home v. Union Pac. R. R, Co., 92 App. Div. 618, affirmed.
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of.the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered April 12, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Maxwell Evarts and W. H. Doughty,. Jr., for Union Pacific Railroad Company, appellant.
John G. Milburn, William S. Maddox and William R. Bronk for Robert Gibson, appellant.
Charles F. Brown, Henry W. Sackett and William A. McQuaid for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion in Jennie Clarkson Home v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Ry. Co. (182 N. Y. 47).
Concur; Cullen, Oh. J., Bartlett, Haight and Werner, JJ.; Gray and O’Brien, JJ., concur in result. Not sitting: Vann, J.