Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Caroline R. Garczynski, Respondent, v. Dorr Russell, Individually and as Executor and Trustee of Lucy G. Russell, Deceased, et al., Appellants
165 N.Y. 668·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Caroline R. Garczynski, Respondent, v. Dorr Russell, Individually and as Executor and Trustee of Lucy G. Russell, Deceased, et al., Appellants.
Garezynski v. Russell, 17 App. Div. 623, affirmed.
(Argued December 10, 1900;
decided February 15, 1901.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered June 9, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
Jesse W. Johnson for appellants.
George M. Weaver and Arthur M. Beardsley for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Cullen and Werner, JJ. Not sitting: Landon, J.