Contracts · MBE-tested
Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.; and Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.
349 U.S. 908·Supreme Court of the United States·1955
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 18, 1955.
No. 320.
No. 322.
Michigan-Wisconsin Pipe Line Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.; and Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. v. Corporation Commission of Oklahoma et al.
Jack T. Conn, D. H. Culton, Coleman Hayes and Arthur R. Seder, Jr. for appellant in No. 320. Edward H. Lange and Mark H. Adams for appellant in No. 322.
Mac Q. Williamson, Attorney General of Oklahoma, for the Corporation Commission of Oklahoma; T. Murray Robinson and Leon Shipp for certain mineral owners in Texas County, Oklahoma; and Rayburn L. Poster, Harry D. Turner, R. M. Williams, Kenneth Heady and Cecil C. Hamilton for the Phillips Petroleum Co., appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeals from the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
Per Curiam:
Judgments reversed. Natural Gas Pipeline Co. v. Panoma Corp., 349 U. S. 44.
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.
Reported below: 272 P. 2d 425.