Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
CARTER, PUBLIC VEHICLE LICENSE COMMISSIONER OF CHICAGO v. MILLER
434 U.S. 35654 L. Ed. 2d 603·Supreme Court of the United States·1978
Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
CARTER, PUBLIC VEHICLE LICENSE COMMISSIONER OF CHICAGO v. MILLER
No. 76-1171.
Argued November 29-30, 1977
Decided January 17, 1978
William R. Quinlan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Daniel Pascóle and Robert Retke.
Robert Masur argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were Alan Freedman, Howard Eglit, and David Goldberger.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by William B. Spann, Jr., and Robert B. McKay for the American Bar Assn.; and by James R. Madison and Norman C. Hile for the San Francisco Lawyers' Committee for Urban Affairs.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.