Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Petitioner, v. Micheal BACA, et al., 2020 — 140 S. Ct. 1564 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Petitioner, v. Micheal BACA, et al.
140 S. Ct. 1564206 L. Ed. 2d 389·Supreme Court of the United States·2020
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, Petitioner,
v.
Micheal BACA, et al.
No. 19-518.
Supreme Court of the United States.
March 10, 2020.
This case is no longer consolidated with No. 19-465, Chiafalo v. Washington, and one hour is allotted for oral argument in this case. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration of this order.