Contracts · MBE-tested
Hyman DARLING, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error
13 F.2d 1021·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1926
Before WADDILL, ROSE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Hyman DARLING, Plaintiff in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
June 24, 1926.)
No. 2486.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling; William E. Baker, Judge.
David A. McKee and John B. Wilson, both of Wheeling, W. Va., for plaintiff in error.
Arthur Arnold, U. S. Atty., of Piedmont, W. Va., and Bussell L. Fnrbee, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Parkersburg, W. Va., for the United States.
Before WADDILL, ROSE, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
We have given careful consideration to this ease, and, in the light of the assignments of error and the arguments of counsel therein, are convinced that there is no error in the action of the trial court complained of, for which a reversal should be had, and that its judgment should be affirmed.
Affirmed.