Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
OULTON v. CALIFORNIA INSURANCE CO.
154 U.S. 615·Supreme Court of the United States·1875
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
OULTON v. CALIFORNIA INSURANCE CO.
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.
No. 170.
Argued February 3, 1875.
Decided February 22, 1875.
Barnes v. Bailroad Go., 17 Wall. 294, and Stoakdale v. Atlantic Ins. Go., 20 Wall. 323, followed.
Mr. Attorney General for plaintiff in error.
Mr. G. E. Whitehead, Mr. F. M. Fixley and Mr. H. J. Tilden for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Chief Justice Waite]
Mr. Chief Justice Waite
delivered the opinion of the court.
The judgment of the Circuit Court is reversed upon the authority of Barnes v. Railroad Co., 17 Wall. 294, and Stockdale v. Atlantic Insurance Co., 20 Wall. 323, decided at the last term, and the cause remanded with instructions to enter judgment in favor of the defendant.