General
Ardalt, Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 59/30537, etc. (New York)
57 Cust. Ct. 837·United States Customs Court·1966
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the Third Division,
December 14, 1966
No. P66/371.
Ardalt, Inc., et al. v. United States, protests 59/30537, etc. (New York).
[MAJORITY — Landis, J.]
Landis, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “D” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of United States v. The Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), and that the items of merchandise marked “T” covered by the foregoing protests consist of cups and saucers similar in all material respects to those the subject of W. Kay Company, Inc. v. United States (53 Cust Ct. 130, C.D. 2484), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.