Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Harry LETMAN et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee
58 F.2d 1082·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Harry LETMAN et al., Appellants, v. UNITED STATES, Appellee.
No. 4808.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
May 21, 1932.
Rehearing Denied June 27, 1932.
Phillip Forman, U. S. Atty., and Walter B. Petry, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Trenton, N. J.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Judgment of sentence as to both defendants is reversed on a finding that the search and seizure were illegal iinder authority of John Vance Taylor v. United States (U. S.) 52 S. Ct. 466, 76 L. Ed.-.