Bankruptcy
BARRETT & DOUGHTY, Inc., et al. v. AMERICAN NAT. BANK OF MACON et al.
209 F. 757·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1913
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BARRETT & DOUGHTY, Inc., et al. v. AMERICAN NAT. BANK OF MACON et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
December 19, 1913.)
Petition to Superintend and Revise, in Matter of Law, Proceedings of the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of South Carolina ; Henry A. Middleton Smith, Judge.
In the matter of the bankruptcy proceedings against H. D. Still’s Sons, alleged bankrupts. On petition by Barrett & Doughty, Inc., and others, creditors of the bankrupt, against the American National Bank of Macon and others, to superintend and revise in matters of law an adjudication against petitioners.
Dismissed, without prejudice.
Alexander Akerman, of Macon, Ga., and R. J. Southall, of Augusta, Ga., for petitioners.
George S. Jones, of Mae’on, Ga., and William H. Fleming, of Augusta, Ga. (Jas. A. Willis and H. L. O’Bannon, both of Barnwell, S. C., W. H. Townsend, of Columbia, S. G., and James Simons and Julian Mitchell, both of Charleston, S. C., on the brief), for respondents.
Before PRITCHARD and KNAPP, Circuit, Judges, and CONNOR, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — KNAPP, Circuit Judge.]
KNAPP, Circuit Judge.
As the decision of this court in No. 1,175, H. D. Still’s Sons v. American National Bank et al., 209 Fed. 749, will have the effect of securing to petitioners, the relief sought’in this proceeding, the petition herein will be dismissed without prejudice.