Margaret N. HERNANDEZ, Administratrix of the Estate of Arturo Hernandez-Mejia, Appellant, v. Thomas E. ROBERTSON, Commissioner of Patents, Appellee

16 F.2d 279·United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·1926

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Margaret N. HERNANDEZ, Administratrix of the Estate of Arturo Hernandez-Mejia, Appellant, v. Thomas E. ROBERTSON, Commissioner of Patents, Appellee. (Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. October 30, 1926.) No. 2531. Appeal from the District Court of the ■United, States for the District of Maryland, :at Baltimore; Morris A. Soper, Judge. Benjamin Boman, of New York City (Jacob F. Murbaeh, of Baltimore, Md., on the brief), for appellant. T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for appellee. Before WADDILL, EOSE, and PAB-KEE, Circuit Judges. [MAJORITY — PEE CUBIAM.] PEE CUBIAM. We are unable to agree with the appellant that there was any error in the conclusion announced in the successive decisions of the Primary Examiner of the Patent Office, of the Board of Examiners in Chief, of the Commissioner of Patents, of the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia (298 F. 1019, 54 App. D. C. 404), and of the District Court for the District of Maryland (16 F.[2d] 276). Affirmed.