Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bankruptcy
John ROSENBAUM, Trustee Clara B. Howell, Bankrupt, v. Jessie C. SHOEMAKER et al.
75 F.2d 1019·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1935
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John ROSENBAUM, Trustee Clara B. Howell, Bankrupt, v. Jessie C. SHOEMAKER et al.
No. 5590.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Feb. 14, 1935.
Max L. Rosenstein, of Newark, N. J., for appellant.
Elmer King and Carl V. Vogt, both of Morristown, N. J., for appellees.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This case depends wholly on its individual facts. No precedent or new principle is involved. A study of the proofs shows the court below committed no error in directing the return, by the trustee in bankruptcy to their owners of the collateral securities in his hands. We accordingly limit ourselves to affirming the court’s order, the costs in this court and the court below to be paid by the bankrupt estate.