General
WASHINGTON v. FISHER
33 F.2d 648·United States District Court for the District of Columbia·1929
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WASHINGTON v. FISHER.
Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.
Submitted May 8, 1929.
Decided June 3, 1929.
No. 4890.
W. C. Martin and Geo. E. C. Hayes, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
John E. Larson, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from an order of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia, in probate, overruling a motion to vacate an order approving an executor’s account. Appeal will not lie from such an order. Tubman v. B. & O. R. Co., 20 App. D. C. 541; Swenk v. Nicholls, 39 App. D. C. 350; Dante v. Bagby, 39 App. D. C. 516; Doyle v. District of Columbia, 45 App. D. C. 90.
The motion to dismiss the appeal is sustained, with costs.