Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Torts · MBE-tested
The People ex rel. Nathan B. Warren et al., Respondents, v. Edward Carter et al., Appellants
119 N.Y. 654·New York Court of Appeals·1890·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People ex rel. Nathan B. Warren et al., Respondents, v. Edward Carter et al., Appellants.
In proceedings under the act of 1880 (Chap. 369, Laws of 1880), to review .an assessment,’ where it appears to the court that the assessors have acted “ with gross negligence,” costs may be awarded against them.
[MAJORITY]
This case presented the same questions and was argued and decided with People ex rel. v. Carter (ante, p. 557).
The additional question was presented here as to the right to allow costs against defendants. As to this the court say: “ The court having found that the assessors acted with gross negligence in assessing the property at $50,000 in 1888, was .authorized by the statute (§ 6) to impose costs upon them.”