General
George W. Mentz, Respondent, v. John Laycock et al., Appellants
114 N.Y. 624·New York Court of Appeals·1889·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George W. Mentz, Respondent, v. John Laycock et al., Appellants.
(Argued April 15, 1889;
decided April 23, 1889.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made April 17, 1886, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff, entered upon a verdict.
Frank M. Loomis for appellants.
Abram Bartholomew for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur, except Bradley and Haight, JJ., not sitting.
Judgment affirmed.