Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Pauline Levy, an Infant, by Bertha Levy, her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Louis Hanneman, Appellant
169 N.Y. 600·New York Court of Appeals·1902·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Pauline Levy, an Infant, by Bertha Levy, her Guardian ad Litem, Respondent, v. Louis Hanneman, Appellant.
Levy v. Hanneman, 63 App. Div. 615, appeal dismissed.
(Argued January 6, 1903;
decided January 14, 1902.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 29, 1901, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict.
The motion was made upon the ground that the recovery being one for personal injuries and the judgment of affirmance in the Appellate Division being unanimous, no appeal lies therefrom as of right and permission to appeal has not been granted.
Ed/ward Fillmore for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
' Motion granted, with ten dollars costs of motion, and appeal dismissed, with costs.