General
Carolina Scenic Coach Lines v. United States et al.
323 U.S. 678·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 637.
Carolina Scenic Coach Lines v. United States et al.
December 11, 1944.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed. (1) North Coast Transportation Co. v. United States, ante, p. 668; (2) Chesapeake & Ohio R. Co. v. United States, 283 U. S. 35, 41-43; United States v. Baltimore & Ohio R. Co., 293 U. S. 454, 464-5; United States v. Pan American Petroleum Corp., 304 U. S. 156, 158; Interstate Commerce Commission v. City of Jersey City, 322 U. S. 503, 512-13; (3) McLean Trucking Co. v. United States, 321 U. S. 67, 86.
Mr. Wilmer A. Hill for appellant.
Solicitor General Fahy and Mr. Daniel W. Knowlton for the United States et al., and Messrs. William A. Roberts and James E. Wilson for the Smoky Mountain Stages, respondents.