Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
LAFONTAN v. ELTING, Collector, et al.
59 F.2d 204·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LAFONTAN v. ELTING, Collector, et al.
No. 379.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
May 27, 1932.
For original opinion, see 58 F.(2d) 180.
Guerra Everett, of New York City (Joseph Wheless and Phillip Burnett Thurston, both of New York City, of counsel), for ap-pellee.
_ Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
As to the obligations of the surety on this bond, see United States, to Use of Zambetti, v. American Fence Construction Co. et al. (C. C. A.) 15 F.(2d) 450; Babcock & Wilcox et al. v. American Surety Co. (C. C. A.) 236 F. 340; United States, for Use of National Regulator Co., v. Montgomery Heating & Ventilating Co. et al. (C. C. A.) 255 F. 683; United States, for Use of W. B. Young Supply Co., v. Stewart et al. (C. C. A.) 288 F. 187; United States, to Use of Stallings et al., v. Starr et al. (C. C. A.) 20 F.(2d) 803.
Petition for rehearing denied.