General
ANDREW WESTBROOK versus RUFUS HATCH AND WILLIAM AUSTIN
3 Blume Sup. Ct. Trans. 177·Michigan Supreme Court·1824·MI
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
ANDREW WESTBROOK versus RUFUS HATCH AND WILLIAM AUSTIN
[MAJORITY]
Journal Entries (1821-24): Journal 3: (1) Rule for special bail or pro-cedendo *p. 198; (2) continued *p. 259; (3) discontinued, judgment for costs *p. 364; (4) judgment for costs rescinded, continued *p. 373; (5) judgment for costs rescinded, continued *p. 376; (6) continued *p. 442; (7). discontinued *p. 505.
Papers in File: (i) Precipe for habeas corpus; (2) writ of habeas corpus and return; (3) copy of indorsement on county court capias; (4) recognizance and bail piece; (5) declaration; (6) plea of nil debet and nul tiel record; (7) stipulation for filing replication; (8) replication; (9) transcript from record of Macomb County Court; (10) copy of recognizance entered into on appeal from John K. Smith, J. P., to Macomb County Court.
1821 Calendar, MS p. 21. Recorded in Book B, MS pp. 353-57.