General
Palmer vs. Brown
1 Cal. 42·Supreme Court of California·1850·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Palmer vs. Brown.
The court will not reverse a judgment where nothing is returned on appeal except the pleadings and judgment of the court below, and these are regular and sufficient. The case of Gonzales v. Huntley Forsyth, (ante. p. 32,) approved.
Appeal from a judgment of the court of First Instance of the district of San Francisco. The facts of the case, so far as they are important, are the same as the facts in the case of Gonzales v. Huntley té Forsyth, (ante, p. 32.) The cause was argued in this court by
John Satterlee, for the plaintiff.
J. B. Hart, for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — By the Court.]
By the Court.
This case is not distinguishable from Gonzales v. Huntley & Forsyth. The judgment is, therefore, affirmed.