Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
In the Matter of The Board of Street Opening, Relative to One Hundred and Twenty-eighth Street in the City of New York. D. J. Yuengling Brewing Company and The Third Avenue Railroad Company, Appellants
148 N.Y. 764·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of The Board of Street Opening, Relative to One Hundred and Twenty-eighth Street in the City of New York. D. J. Yuengling Brewing Company and The Third Avenue Railroad Company, Appellants.
Reported below, 82 Hun, 580.
(Argued March 2, 1896;
decided March 13, 1896.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme ■Court in the first judicial department, made December 14, 1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term confirming a report of commissioners of estimate and assessment in this proceeding, and denying a motion by appellants for its discontinuance.
Louis Marshall for appellants.
David J. Dean for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed on the main proposition discussed in Judge 'O’Brien’s opinion below, ivitli costs.
All concur.