Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. COLUMBIA STEEL CORPORATION, a Corporation, Respondent
67 F.2d 989·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner, v. COLUMBIA STEEL CORPORATION, a Corporation, Respondent.
No. 7175.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Dec. 11, 1933.
Sewall Key, Sp. Asst, to Atty. Gen., and Head, Tax Section, Dept, of Justice, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Walter S. Orr, A. C. Newlin, and J. D. Pratt White, all of New York City, for respondent.
Before WILBUR, SAWTELLE, and GARRECHT, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon motion of counsel for petitioner that this cause be dismissed because it is controlled by the .decision of this court in San Joaquin Light & Power Corporation v. McLaughlin, 65 F.(2d) 677, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the petition to review herein be dismissed; mandate forthwith.