Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Beaver et al. v. United States
383 U.S. 937·Supreme Court of the United States·1966
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Thaddeus Rojek for petitioners.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 936.
Beaver et al. v. United States.
Mr. Justice Douglas is of the opinion that certiorari should be granted. Thaddeus Rojek for petitioners.
Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, Roger P. Marquis and Elizabeth Dudley for the United States. Darrell F. Smith, Attorney General, and Dale R. Shumway, Special Assistant Attorney General, for the State of Arizona, as amicus curiae, in support of the petition.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.