Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
Robert SIMPSON et al., Appellant, v. CITY OF JUNEAU, a Municipal Corporation, et al., Appellees
36 F.2d 907·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1929
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Robert SIMPSON et al., Appellant, v. CITY OF JUNEAU, a Municipal Corporation, et al., Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
December 3, 1929.
No. 5930.
J. A. Hellenthal and Simon Hellenthal, both of Juneau, Alaska, for appellants.
R. E. Robertson, of Juneau, Alaska, for appellees.
Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and WILBUR, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
The decree is affirmed, on the authority of Valentine v. City of Juneau (No. 5931) 36 F. (2d) 994, this day decided.