Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Jiles R. TRAVIS, Plaintiff in Error, v. Thomas P. HEFFERNEN et al.
2 F.2d 1022·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1924
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jiles R. TRAVIS, Plaintiff in Error, v. Thomas P. HEFFERNEN et al.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
March 22, 1924.)
In 6538.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma.
B. M. Parmenter and Arch M. Parmenter, both of Lawton, Okl., for plaintiff in error.
J. H. Everest, of Oklahoma City, Okl., and W. C. Stevens and J. H. Cline, both of Lawton, Okl., for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Writ of error dismissed, with costs, on motion of plaintiff in error and consent of defendant in error.