Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri et al. v. Danforth, Attorney General of Missouri, et al.; and Danforth, Attorney General of Missouri v. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri et al.
423 U.S. 1044·Supreme Court of the United States·1976
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 74-1151.
No. 74-1419.
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri et al. v. Danforth, Attorney General of Missouri, et al.; and Danforth, Attorney General of Missouri v. Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from D. C. E. D. Mo. [Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 819.] Motion of Lawyers for Life, Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief as amici curiae granted. Motions of D. C. Right of Life Committee (Wash., D. C.) et al., and Dr. Eugene Diamond et al. for leave to file briefs as amici curiae denied.