General
THE ST. PAUL. VANELIUS v. UNITED STATES
87 F. 1006·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1898
Before GILBERT, ROSS, and MORROW, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
THE ST. PAUL. VANELIUS v. UNITED STATES.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
February 7, 1898.)
No. 181.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Alaska.
Warren Gregory, for appellant. Charles A. Garter, for the United States.
Before GILBERT, ROSS, and MORROW, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This case is precisely similar to the case entitled “La Ninfa,” heretofore decided by this court, and reported in 44 U. S. App. 648, 21 C. C. A. 434, and 75 Fed. 513. On the authority of that case, the decree appealed from is reversed, and the cause remanded, with instructions to the district court to dismiss the libel.