Daniel DEVINE, Appellant, v. Arnold PFAU, Appellee

17 F.2d 1008·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit·1927

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Associate Justice, and GRAHAM, Presiding Judge U. S. Court of Customs Appeals.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Daniel DEVINE, Appellant, v. Arnold PFAU, Appellee. (Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia. Submitted Jan. 17, 1927. Decided March 7, 1927.) No. 1925. J. L. Norris and C. A. Bateman, both of Washington, D. C., and Wm. Abbe, of New York City, for appellant. G. F. De Wein, of Milwaukee, Wis., for appellee. Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, ROBB, Associate Justice, and GRAHAM, Presiding Judge U. S. Court of Customs Appeals. [MAJORITY — ROBB, J.] ROBB, J. Appeal from concurrent decisions of the tribunals of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding, in which priority was awarded Pfau, who was first to conceive and first to reduce to practice. For the reasons fully stated’ by the Patent Office, we affirm the decision. Affirmed.