General
Margaret Sarro and Joseph Sarro, Appellants, v. A. I. Namm & Son, Inc., and New York Telephone Company, Respondents
251 A.D. 726·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1937·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Margaret Sarro and Joseph Sarro, Appellants, v. A. I. Namm & Son, Inc., and New York Telephone Company, Respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Action for damages for personal injuries by the plaintiff wife and for loss of her services by the plaintiff husband. The complaint was dismissed at the close of plaintiffs’ case on the motion of the defendants. From the judgment entered, plaintiffs appeal. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with "’ costs. No opinion. Present — Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ.; Lazansky, P. J., not voting.