Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tax
In the Matter of Opening and Widening Hudson Avenue, in the City of Albany
62 N.Y. 611·New York Court of Appeals·1875·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Opening and Widening Hudson Avenue, in the City of Albany.
(Argued April 20, 1875;
decided April 27, 1875.)
This was an appeal from an order of General Term affirming an order of Special Term so far as it ordered a retaxation of certain costs and expenses allowed to the city attorney and city surveyor in the proceedings. (Reported below, 2 Hun, 580.)
Nathaniel C. Moak for the appellants.
R. W. Peckham for the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal. Ho opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.