Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Quality & Service Laundry, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board
318 U.S. 775·Supreme Court of the United States·1943
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 706.
Quality & Service Laundry, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board.
March 15, 1943.
Mr. Louis A. Spiess for petitioner. Solicitor General Fahy and Messrs. Valentine Brookes, Robert B. Watts, and Ernest A. Gross, and Misses Ruth Weyand and Fannie M. Boyls for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denied.