General
GALLICE et al. v. CRILLY
143 F. 179·United States Circuit Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania·1906
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
GALLICE et al. v. CRILLY.
(Circuit Court, E. D. Pennsylvania.
January 31, 1906.)
No. 34.
See 134 Fed. 983.
Beck & Robinson, for plaintiffs.
Thomas R. Elcock and John G. Johnson, for defendant,
[MAJORITY — HOLLAND, District Judge.]
HOLLAND, District Judge.
The decision just rendered in No. 21 of the same sessions- (143 Fed. 178) disposes of the issues here, and judgment will be entered in favor of the plaintiffs, Henry Gallice and Octave Gallice, copartners, trading under the firm name of Gallice & Co., and against Francis J. Crilly, the defendant, for the amount of the note, with interest, with the right to either party to take an appeal from such judgment.