Securities
Shaw versus Wallace
2 U.S. 1792 Dall. 179·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1792·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
September Term, 1792.
Shaw versus Wallace.
THIS cause was set down for trial; but was afterwards continued by the plaintiff. The defendant’s attorney, prayed a rule might be granted for security for costs, the plaintiff residing in New-York. Moylan, objected, that the motion came too late, after the cause had been marked for trial.
[MAJORITY — By the Court :]
But,
By the Court :
—It is never too late to grant the rule, when it will not delay the trial.
Rule granted.