Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
Incres Steamship Co., Ltd., v. International Maritime Workers Union et al.
369 U.S. 827·Supreme Court of the United States·1962
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
March 26, 1962.
No. 469.
Incres Steamship Co., Ltd., v. International Maritime Workers Union et al.
Mr. Justice Whittaker took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders were this day announced.
[MAJORITY]
Certiorari, 368 U. S. 924, to the Court of Appeals of New York. The motion of the Republic of Liberia for leave to file brief, as amicus curiae, is granted.