Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Corporations
Wm. H. MOORE, Jr., as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Estate of Coso Hot Springs, Inc., a Corporation, Appellant, v. David B. SCOTT, Receiver in Equity of Coso Hot Springs, Inc., a Corporation, Appellee
55 F.2d 866·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Wm. H. MOORE, Jr., as Trustee in Bankruptcy of Estate of Coso Hot Springs, Inc., a Corporation, Appellant, v. David B. SCOTT, Receiver in Equity of Coso Hot Springs, Inc., a Corporation, Appellee.
No. 6506.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Jan. 25, 1932.
Reuben G. Hunt, of San Francisco, Cal, for appellant.
W. I. Titus, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before WILBUR and SAWTELLE, Circuit Judges, and ST. SURE, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.]
SAWTELLE, Circuit Judge.
On authority of Moore v. Scott (C. C. A.), 55 F.(2d) 863, decided this day, the judgment of the lower court is reversed, with the same instructions as given in that case. In' addition to the many cases there cited, see also Petition of Shortridge et al. (C. C. A. 9), 20 F.(2d) 638, 639:
Judgment reversed.