Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Douglas W. Gray, Appellant, v. Isaac Meyer et al., Respondents
184 N.Y. 595·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Douglas W. Gray, Appellant, v. Isaac Meyer et al., Respondents.
Gray v. Meyer, 100 App. Div. 513, affirmed.
(Argued March 19, 1906;
decided April 3, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court'in the fourth judicial department, entered February 3, 1905, affirming a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict directed by the court and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Francis F. Wood for appellant.
Warren J. Gheney for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, Avitli costsno opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Edavard T. Bartlett, Haight and Vann, JJ. Dissenting: Willard Bartlett, and Chase, JJ.