Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
General
Fannie P. Cottle, Administratrix, etc., et al., Appellants, v. William G. Milligan, Administrator, etc., Respondent, Impleaded, etc.
151 N.Y. 650·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Fannie P. Cottle, Administratrix, etc., et al., Appellants, v. William G. Milligan, Administrator, etc., Respondent, Impleaded, etc.
(Argued December 14, 1896;
decided January 19, 1897.)
Appeal from an order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered December 18, 1893, which dismissed an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Edmund P. Cottle for appellants.
John Lansing for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Martin and Vann, JJ., not sitting.