Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Contracts · MBE-tested
General Motors Corp. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) et al.
389 U.S. 857·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certio-rari should be granted. · Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 316.
General Motors Corp. v. International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW) et al.
Aloysim F. Power, Harry S. Benjamin, Jr., Eugene L. Hartwig, George Cherpelis and K. Douglas Marni for petitioner.
Stephen I. Schlossberg, John A. Fillion, Bernard F. Ashe, Jordan Bossen, Joseph L. Rauh, Jr., and John Silard for International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America (UAW), and Solicitor General Marshall, Arnold Ordma/n, Dominick L. Manoli and Norton J. Come for the National Labor Relations Board, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart are of the opinion that certio-rari should be granted.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.