General
Rosolino Militello, Fortunato Militello and Lena Antinelli, Appellants, v. Samuel Barone, Nathaniel Roven, Stephen Immerso, John Ciano, Also Known as Agostino Ciano, Respondents
252 A.D. 876·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1937·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rosolino Militello, Fortunato Militello and Lena Antinelli, Appellants, v. Samuel Barone, Nathaniel Roven, Stephen Immerso, John Ciano, Also Known as Agostino Ciano, Respondents.
(Appeal No. 2.)
[MAJORITY]
Appeal by the plaintiffs from four orders entered on the separate motions of the defendants to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. Orders affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to respondents jointly. No opinion. Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.