General
Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States
61 Cust. Ct. 563·United States Customs Court·1968
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(R.D. 11604)
Entry No. 1016134.
Haddad & Sons, Inc. v. United States
(Decided December 19, 1968)
James G. McGoldriok for the plaintiff.
Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.
[MAJORITY — Rao, Chief Judge:]
Rao, Chief Judge:
When the above-enumerated appeal for re-praisement was called for hearing, the plaintiff submitted the case on the record before the court.
An examination of the official papers discloses no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct value of the merchandise found by the appraiser.
I, therefore, find and hold the proper dutiable value of the merchandise covered by said appeal to be the value found by the appraiser.
Judgment will be entered accordingly.